{"id":79,"date":"2017-12-10T20:18:00","date_gmt":"2017-12-10T18:18:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/webpages.tuni.fi\/gamification\/?p=79"},"modified":"2017-12-10T20:18:00","modified_gmt":"2017-12-10T18:18:00","slug":"the-convergence-of-gaming-and-gambling","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/webpages.tuni.fi\/gamification\/2017\/12\/10\/the-convergence-of-gaming-and-gambling\/","title":{"rendered":"The Convergence of Gaming and Gambling?"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n
\n
In the last few days and weeks the relationship between digital games and gambling has become a topic of interest to mainstream society with both national media and politicians debating the topic\u00a04<\/sup><\/a>,\u00a0<\/sup>30<\/a><\/sup>. This is the latest aspect that has seen increased attention placed on the role of gambling, and gambling companies, in contemporary society\u00a046<\/sup><\/a>,\u00a0<\/sup>13<\/sup><\/a>,\u00a0<\/sup>11<\/sup><\/a>. The international journal\u00a0Computers in Human Behavior<\/em>\u00a0has just accepted one of the first academic articles specifically addressing gambling connected to video games: \u201cInvestigating Relationships Between Video Gaming, Spectating Esports, and Gambling\u201d, by Joseph Macey and Juho Hamari\u00a034<\/sup>, which can be found\u00a0here<\/a>. The timing could not be more relevant and the growth of media interest in this area has inspired the following discussion.<\/p>\n

In recent decades we have seen a general trend toward liberalisation of gambling practices internationally\u00a029, 15, 35, 28<\/sup>. Against this background active participation in gambling has been growing, as have rates of at-risk and problem gamblers in both adolescent and adult populations\u00a08<\/sup>. Gambling is big business, and big news.<\/p>\n

The same timeframe has also seen the increased gamification of our everyday life; in many areas services, systems an practices are converging with games and gameful design\u00a026<\/sup>, and the ludification of culture, the ways in which identities are transformed by computer games and other digital technologies\u00a040<\/sup>.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

Gamification Word Cloud: Geoff Simon<\/em><\/p>\n

Alongside which the growing prevalence of games as both leisure and instrumental activities\u00a014, 37<\/sup>, of virtual economies\u00a032<\/sup>, and the increased use of both micro-transactions and the free-to-play business model\u00a01, 25<\/sup>, have all contributed to the increased accessibility and appeal of both video games and gambling and while gamification of our lives can generally be considered a positive development, the larger media convergence related to video games, gambling and game industry of has also brought on possible problematic aspects.<\/p>\n

The blurring of boundaries between video games and gambling activities has led to a range of problematic scenarios for regulators and legislative bodies\u00a043<\/sup>. Although the consequences of this trend are yet to be fully assessed, concerns regarding the potentially negative effects are numerous, they include: the targeting of vulnerable populations, most notably young people, through \u201cgambling-like\u201d experiences; and increased penetration of gambling using socially-accepted vehicles, whether sports or video games\u00a033<\/sup>.<\/p>\n

Allied to these specific concerns are those aspects of internet gambling which have been highlighted as potentially facilitating problematic behaviour, such as increased ease of access and the continuous availability of formerly discontinuous gambling activities\u00a05, 20, 7<\/sup>.<\/p>\n

For anyone inside the gaming community it will have been hard to escape the topic in recent years: whether it be the growing popularity of esports betting, controversies and debates over the practice of skins gambling, or even discussions about the game mechanics utilised in free-to-play games.<\/p>\n

Controversy: Battlefront 2<\/h2>\n

But why has the issue been catapulted into mainstream awareness now? The answer is simple:\u00a0Battlefront 2<\/em>.<\/p>\n<\/article>\n

\"\"Battlefront 2: EA\/DICE<\/em>A quick summary of the situation is that a \u201cpremium\u201d game, which costs around $60 to buy, decided to implent loot boxes as part of the in-game economy. Players use an in-game currency to unlock the boxes in order to access randomly-generated rewards, the currency can either be earned by playing the game or purchased with real-world currencies.Nothing new here; the practice of increasing monetisation of a game using loot boxes (crates, chests, cases, or any other similarly named item) started with free-to-play games and has since spread to many other business models. Indeed the practice was first popularised in Asia over 10 years ago\u00a036<\/sup><\/a>, when Valve introduced the mechanic into Team Fortress 2 in 2010 it arguably provoked a move to the F2P business model\u00a031<\/sup><\/a>. Other games such as the FIFA franchise, Mass Effect 3, and Dead Space 3 are notable early adopters.More recently\u00a0Overwatch<\/em>\u00a0has been held up as an example of the most successful implementation of the mechanic into premium AAA games, thereby legitimising it as a viable model for other game developers and publishers\u00a038<\/sup><\/a>. However, in\u00a0Overwatch<\/em>, the rewards obtained are limited to essentially decorative items and in-game currency, a player\u2019s progress is not tied to the items contained in loot boxes.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

Overwatch Loot Box: Blizzard<\/em><\/p>\n

This is where the makers of\u00a0Battlefront 2<\/em>\u00a0went wrong: certain items required for character progression were only available through opening loot boxes, and the randomly-generated nature of the contents meant players could never be sure whether they would receive the required items. Whether or not the players are fully aware of the nature of these randomly assigned prizes is a question that requires further investigation.<\/p>\n

Compounding the above problem, the processes of earning currency by playing the game was organised in such a way that it would require many thousands of hours of play in order to potentially unlock all the contents of the game\u00a02<\/sup><\/a>\u2026 a game that already cost an initial $60 to purchase. There was an immediate backlash from the fan community and an online campaign was initiated which led to the suspension of all in-game transactions and the attention of Belgium\u2019s gambling regulators\u00a04<\/sup><\/a>. A full explanation of the case can be found\u00a0here<\/a>21<\/sup><\/a>.<\/p>\n

There is a debate as to whether loot boxes constitute a form of gambling\u00a010<\/sup><\/a>, for most regulating authorities the situation is clouded by the use of virtual currencies and items, as they rely on a definition of gambling which includes paying a stake for the chance to win a prize. In this definition both the initial stake and the payout are quantified in terms of real-world money.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n<\/article>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

3D illustration by Quince Media<\/em><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\n
\n
The question centres on discussions as to what constitutes \u201creal\u201d money.<\/p>\n

Currencies: real vs virtual<\/h2>\n

People may be familiar with the idea of crypto-currencies, such as Bitcoin, however many more variations on this theme exist: there are in-game currencies that are earned through achievements; there are in-game currencies which are purchased with real-world money; there are in-game currencies which can only be used in-game; there are in-game currencies which have online market exchanges. The situation gets even more complicated by the fact that, in addition to in-game currencies, there are in-game items (earned or purchased) obtained via loot boxes, which have online market places where they are traded. Like any other commodity value is set according to supply and demand, with\u201drare\u201d items being purchased for many hundreds of dollars, despite the fact that the items are entirely decorative and do not affect gameplay in any way\u2026 welcome to the world of \u201cskins\u201d\u00a06<\/sup><\/a>.The game most readily associated with skins, and especially skins gambling, is\u00a0Counter Strike: Global Offensive<\/em>. As\u00a0CS:GO<\/em>\u00a0is a popular title in the international esports scene, skins gambling has often been discussed in terms of \u201cesports gambling\u201d but this is something of a misnomer as, despite utilising in-game items, the gambling activities often have limited connections to the esports per se.<\/p>\n<\/article>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

Counter Strike: Global Offensive Weapons Skins: Valve<\/em><\/p>\n

What is esports?<\/h2>\n

The phenomenon of esports is one which encapsulates the connected themes of gamification, ludification, and the convergence of digital cultures. It is a form of sports where play is \u201cfacilitated by electronic systems\u201d, i.e. competitive video gaming organised into leagues and tournaments\u00a027<\/sup>. Industry analysts predict the number of global viewers to rise to 375 million during 2017\u00a012<\/sup>. Additionally, esports gambling has only recently been embraced by mainstream companies, and fantasy esports did not exist prior to 2015, yet the two activities\u2019 total active participants already exceeded 2.25 million within a year\u00a012<\/sup>. Furthermore, it was estimated that over 3m people actively participated in the informal markets surrounding in-game items, such as skins lotteries\u00a012<\/sup>during 2016.<\/p>\n

Esports gambling is virtually identical to match betting and fantasy sports are virtually identical to established formats which use football, baseball, or any other traditional sport where wagers are placed on outcomes and events\u00a044<\/sup>.<\/p>\n

However, more novel manifestations of gambling practices have been realised, they include: PvP betting, opening loot crates\/cases (as described above), skins lotteries, and the use of skins as wagers for casino and card games. PvP betting is a form of gambling where players stake money on their own performance rather than on the performance of others\u00a023<\/sup>. Skins are used in gambling in two ways: first, as wagers in place of real-world currency for games ranging from simulated coin-flipping to real-world sports betting; second, as stakes in \u201clotteries\u201d where the higher a player\u2019s stake (as a percentage of the total pot) the higher their chance of winning the total pot, essentially a form of \u201cjackpot\u201d-style lottery\u00a023<\/sup>. The most recent gambling activity to emerge in this area is \u201ccrash betting\u201d, essentially a digital version of \u201cchicken\u201d in which the player tries to remain \u201cin play\u201d for as long as possible before the game \u201ccrashes\u201d. The longer a player stays in, the bigger the multiplier of their origianl stake, but as time progresses so does the chance that the game will crash, leaving the player with nothing.<\/p>\n

Other forms of gambling related to video\/digital games but not associated with eSports are: Social Network Casino games (SNCs), free-play or practice areas of casino sites, in-game simulated gambling, and in-game gambling with proprietary virtual currencies such as in the games\u00a0Eve Online\u00a0<\/em>17, 45<\/sup>.<\/p>\n

Work addressing the direct relationship between video gaming and gambling habits has only recently begun to be published\u00a016, 19<\/sup>. However, there is a longer history of research into the structural similarities of video games and slot machines\u00a022<\/sup>, as well as investigation of video gaming and associated pathological behaviour\u00a039, 24<\/sup>.<\/p>\n<\/article>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

Slot Machines of Japan: Corpse Reviver<\/em><\/p>\n

Gaming and gambling<\/h2>\n

A key area of interest is whether there are particular characteristics of video gaming that serve to mediate, or facilitate, the practice of gambling. An example of the potential value of this knowledge would be to improve methods of identifying and treating those at risk of developing behavioural problems.<\/p>\n

We can see that, from the large number of unregulated gambling sites connected to games, current international regulatory practices relating to the area are fragmented and not adequate to deal with this global activity\u00a041<\/sup><\/a>. It is also apparent that some game developers appear unable, or unwilling, to address the issue themselves and find themselves subject to the threat of legal action\u00a09<\/sup><\/a>. What we can see from this is that some developers are purposefully developing virtual economies as a way to increase the monetisation of consumers without regard to the potentially harmful effects on vulnerable groups, such as adolescents.<\/p>\n

However, it is not the games industry that is creating this potentially damaging environment, it is the lack of understanding that permeates all sectors of society; from the general population, policy makers and regulators, to the gamers themselves. Recent reports have surfaced in the mainstream media which highlight the potentially serious effects of the current situation\u00a03<\/sup><\/a>.<\/p>\n

One potential course of action would simply be to provide players with information regarding probabilities relating to the \u201cpayouts\u201d offered by any given loot box, thereby allowing consumers to make a more informed choice. This is an approach recently adopted by Chinese authorities\u00a042<\/sup><\/a>.<\/p>\n

Research initiative<\/h2>\n

Research on loot boxes is conducted at as part of the eSports research project at the\u00a0Gamification Group<\/a>\u00a0(website under update, in the mean time, check\u00a0http:\/\/gamification.gg\/<\/a>) of Tampere University of Technology and University of Tampere which is focused on the convergence of games and everyday life.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n<\/article>\n

 <\/p>\n

President Barack Obama uses a virtual reality headset in the Outer Oval Office, Aug. 24, 2016. Personal aide Ferial Govashiri sits at her desk at left. (Official White House Photo by Pete Souza)<\/em>Early findings to come out of the Esports Research Project provide several points of interest. The first is that the contemporary gaming and gambling environments do not have shared patterns of addictive behaviours, in fact the more engaged plyers are with video games, the less likely they are to gamble. In fact, rates of gambling in video gamers and esports enthusiasts are lower than those in the general population\u00a034<\/sup>. Second, results indicate that gambling connected to esports may indeed be an area of concern due to the fact that rates of problematic gambling, measured using PGSI, are significantly higher among esports enthusiasts compared to the general population\u00a034<\/sup>. Additionally, results indicate that as engagement with esports grows, so does both the frequency of gambling and the range of gambling activities in which individuals participate.The value of this research is also demonstrated in the fact that it has produced results that contribute to a growing body of evidence in which traditional understanding of the relationship between playing video games and gambling is questioned\u00a034<\/sup>. As such, the role of media convergence in facilitating problematic behaviours has been further highlighted, an important issue to consider when developing a holistic understanding of potentially problematic gambling in a digital context.<\/p>\n

References:<\/h2>\n
    \n
  1. Alha, K., Koskinen, E., Paavilainen, J., Hamari, J., & Kinnunen, J. (2014). Free-to-play games: Professionals\u2019 perspectives.Proceedings of Nordic Digra,\u00a02014.<\/li>\n
  2. [AngryJoeShow]. (8 October 2017).\u00a0Angry Rant \u2013 WTF?! at the Loot Crates in Battlefront 2!\u00a0<\/em>[Video File]. Retrieved from:\u00a0https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=ne4CnyNW9O4<\/a><\/li>\n
  3. Brustein, J., & Novy-Williams, E. (2016). Virtyal Weapons are Turning Teen Gamers Into Serious Gamblers. Retrieved from:\u00a0https:\/\/www.bloomberg.com\/features\/2016-virtual-guns-counterstrike-gambling\/<\/a><\/li>\n
  4. Chalk, A. (2017). Belgium\u2019s Justice Minister calls for loot box ban in Europe (Updated). Retrieved from:\u00a0http:\/\/www.pcgamer.com\/belgium-says-loot-boxes-are-gambling-wants-them-banned-in-europe\/?utm_content=buffer66185&utm_medium=social&utm_source=facebook&utm_campaign=buffer_pcgamerfb<\/a><\/li>\n
  5. Cotte, J., & Latour, K. (2009). Blackjack in the kitchen: Understanding online versus casino gambling. Journal of Consumer Research, 35(5), 742-758.<\/li>\n
  6. Counter Strike. (2017). Skins. Retrieved from:\u00a0http:\/\/counterstrike.wikia.com\/wiki\/Skins<\/a><\/li>\n
  7. Deans, E. G., Thomas, S. L., Daube, M., & Derevensky, J. (2016). \u201cI can sit on the beach and punt through my mobile phone\u201d: The influence of physical and online environments on the gambling risk behaviours of young men. Social Science & Medicine, 166, 110-119.<\/li>\n
  8. Delfabbro, P., King, D. L., & Derevensky, J. L. (2016). Adolescent Gambling and Problem Gambling: Prevalence, Current Issues, and Concerns.\u00a0Current Addiction Reports,\u00a03(3), 268-274.<\/li>\n
  9. Doman, M. (2016). Counter-Strike developers Valve face lawsuit over \u2018unconscionable, illegal\u2019 online skins gambling. Retreived from:\u00a0http:\/\/www.abc.net.au\/news\/2016-06-28\/counter-strikes-valve-face-lawsuit-over-skins-gambling\/7546646<\/a><\/li>\n
  10. Donnelly, J. (2017). Blizzard CEO on loot boxes: \u2018I don\u2019t think Overwatch belongs in that controversy\u2019. Retreived from:\u00a0http:\/\/www.pcgamer.com\/blizzard-president-on-loot-boxes-i-dont-think-overwatch-belongs-in-that-controversy\/<\/a><\/li>\n
  11. Edwards, E. (2017). Betting firms \u2018should be taken out of sports sponsorship\u2019. Retrieved from:\u00a0https:\/\/www.irishtimes.com\/sport\/betting-firms-should-be-taken-out-of-sports-sponsorship-1.3280539<\/a><\/li>\n
  12. Eilers Research: \u201ceSports Betting: It\u2019s Real, and Bigger Than You Think: Executive Summary\u201d (2015). Retrieved from:\u00a0http:\/\/www.esportsbets.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/09\/eSports-Betting-White-Paper-Exec-Summary.pdf<\/a><\/li>\n
  13. Ellson, A. (2017). Problem gambling grows by 50% in three years. Retrieved from:https:\/\/www.thetimes.co.uk\/article\/problem-gambling-grows-by-50-in-three-years-6b3w539tb<\/li>\n
  14. ESA Annual report (2015). Retrieved from:\u00a0http:\/\/www.theesa.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/10\/ESA_2013_Annual_Report.pdf on 2\/8\/2016<\/a><\/li>\n
  15. Fong, D. K., Fong, H. N., & Li, S. Z. (2011). The social cost of gambling in Macao: Before and after the liberalisation of the gaming industry. International Gambling Studies,11(01), 43-56.<\/li>\n
  16. Forrest, C. J., King, D. L., & Delfabbro, P. H. (2015). The gambling preferences and behaviors of a community sample of Australian regular video game players.\u00a0Journal of Gambling Studies, 1-12.<\/li>\n
  17. Gainsbury, S. M., Hing, N., Delfabbro, P. H., & King, D. L. (2014). A taxonomy of gambling and casino games via social media and online technologies. International Gambling Studies, 14(2), 196-213.<\/li>\n
  18. Gainsbury, S. M., Russell, A., Hing, N., Wood, R., Lubman, D. I., & Blaszczynski, A. (2014). The prevalence and determinants of problem gambling in australia: Assessing the impact of interactive gambling and new technologies. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors : Journal of the Society of Psychologists in Addictive Behaviors, 28(3), 769-779.<\/li>\n
  19. Gainsbury, S. M., Russell, A. M., King, D. L., Delfabbro, P., & Hing, N. (2016). Migration from social casino games to gambling: motivations and characteristics of gamers who gamble.\u00a0Computers in Human Behavior,\u00a063, 59-67.<\/li>\n
  20. Gainsbury, S., Wood, R., Russell, A., Hing, N., & Blaszczynski, A. (2012). A digital revolution: Comparison of demographic profiles, attitudes and gambling behavior of internet and non-internet gamblers. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(4), 1388.<\/li>\n
  21. Gilbert, B. (2017). The new \u2018Star Wars\u2019 game is embroiled in controversy, and fans are furious \u2014 here\u2019s what\u2019s going on. Retrieved from:\u00a0http:\/\/www.businessinsider.com\/star-wars-battlefront-2-mess-explained-2017-11?r=US&IR=T&IR=T\/#problems-started-long-before-the-games-release-1<\/a><\/li>\n
  22. Griffiths, M., & Wood, R. T. (2000). Risk factors in adolescence: The case of gambling, videogame playing, and the Internet.\u00a0Journal of gambling studies,16(2-3), 199-225.<\/li>\n
  23. Grove, C. (2016). Esports & Gambling: Where\u2019s the Action? Retrieved from\u00a0https:\/\/www.esportsbettingreport.com\/gambling\/<\/a><\/li>\n
  24. Gunuc, S. (2015). Relationships and associations between video game and Internet addictions: Is tolerance a symptom seen in all conditions. Computers in Human Behavior,\u00a049, 517-525.<\/li>\n
  25. Hamari, J. (2015). Why do people buy virtual goods? Attitude toward virtual good purchases versus game enjoyment.International Journal of Information Management,\u00a035(3), 299-308.<\/li>\n
  26. Hamari, J., Huotari, K., & Tolvanen, J. (2015). Gamification and economics. In S. P. Walz & S. Deterding (Eds.), The Gameful World: Approaches, Issues, Applications (pp. 139-161). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.<\/li>\n
  27. Hamari, J., & Sj\u00f6blom, M. (2016). What is eSports and why do people watch it? Internet research. DOI: 10.1108\/IntR-04-2016-<\/li>\n
  28. Jensen, C. (2016). Money over misery: restrictive gambling legislation in an era of liberalization.Journal of European Public Policy, 1-16.<\/li>\n
  29. Kingma, S. (2006).The Leeway of Lotteries in the European Union. An pilotstudy on the liberalisation of gambling markets in EU. Rozenberg Publishers.<\/li>\n
  30. Knaus, C. (2017). Gambling regulators to investigate \u2018loot boxes\u2019 in video games. Retrieved from:\u00a0https:\/\/www.theguardian.com\/games\/2017\/nov\/24\/gambling-regulators-to-investigate-loot-boxes-in-video-games<\/a><\/li>\n
  31. Lahti, E. (2011). BREAKING: Team Fortress 2 is now free to play \u201cforever\u201d. Retreived from: http:\/\/www.pcgamer.com\/breaking-team-fortress-2-is-now-free-to-play-forever\/<\/li>\n
  32. Lehdonvirta, V., & Castronova, E. (2014).Virtual economies: Design and analysis. MIT Press.<\/li>\n
  33. Lopez-Gonzalez, H., & Griffiths, M. D. (2016). Understanding the convergence of markets in online sports betting. International Review for the Sociology of Sport.<\/li>\n
  34. Macey, J., & Hamari, J. (2018). Investigating relationships between video gaming, spectating esports, and gambling. Computers in Human Behavior, 80, 344-353.<\/li>\n
  35. Markham, F., & Young, M. (2015). \u201cBig Gambling\u201d: The rise of the global industry-state gambling complex.Addiction Research & Theory,\u00a023(1), 1-4.<\/li>\n
  36. Martinson, J. (2007). Gamble your life away in ZT Online. Retrieved from: http:\/\/www.danwei.org\/electronic_games\/gambling_your_life_away_in_zt.php<\/li>\n
  37. M\u00e4yr\u00e4, F. (2016, May 23) The Finnish Player Barometer 2015 (Pelaajabarometri 2015 Lajityyppien suosio). Retrieved from:\u00a0http:\/\/tampub.uta.fi\/handle\/10024\/99003 on 2\/8\/2016<\/a><\/li>\n
  38. Newman, J. (2017). How Loot Boxes Led to Never-Ending Games (And Always-Paying Players): A history of loot boxes and their impact on video games. Retrieved from: http:\/\/www.rollingstone.com\/glixel\/features\/loot-boxes-never-ending-games-and-always-paying-players-w511655<\/li>\n
  39. Ng, B. D., & Wiemer-Hastings, P. (2005). Addiction to the internet and online gaming.Cyberpsychology & behavior,\u00a08(2), 110-113.<\/li>\n
  40. Raessens, J. (2006). Playful identities, or the ludification of culture.\u00a0Games and Culture,\u00a01(1), 52-57.<\/li>\n
  41. Tassi, P. (2016). CS:GO Lotto Controversy Raises Issues About YouTuber Disclosure, Valve\u2019s Indifference. Retrieved from:\u00a0https:\/\/www.forbes.com\/sites\/insertcoin\/2016\/07\/05\/cs-go-lotto-controversy-raises-issues-about-youtuber-disclosure-valves-indifference\/#586d08b65b31<\/a><\/li>\n
  42. Tassi, P. (2017). China Has Forced Blizzard To Reveal Exact \u2018Overwatch\u2019 And \u2018Hearthstone\u2019 Drop Rates. Retrieved from:\u00a0https:\/\/www.forbes.com\/sites\/insertcoin\/2017\/05\/05\/china-has-forced-blizzard-to-reveal-exact-overwatch-and-hearthstone-drop-rates\/#5186a38d5a14<\/a><\/li>\n
  43. Teichert, T., Gainsbury, S., & Muhlbach, C. (2017). Positioning of online gambling and gaming products from a consumer perspective: A blurring of perceived boundaries. Computers in Human Behavior.<\/li>\n
  44. Tsai, M. R. (2015). Fantasy (e) sports: The future prospect of fantasy sports betting amongst organized multiplayer video game competitions. UNLV Gaming LJ, 6, 393.<\/li>\n
  45. Woodford, D. (May 17, 2013). Dispute resolution across platforms : Offshore gambling industry & EVE online. In Proceedings of the 1st International Workshop on EVE Online (39-46).<\/li>\n
  46. Zarb-Cousin, M. (2017). We can\u2019t let fixed-odds betting terminals keep ruining lives. Retrieved from:\u00a0https:\/\/www.newstatesman.com\/2017\/10\/we-can-t-let-fixed-odds-betting-terminals-keep-ruining-lives<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<\/article>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

    In the last few days and weeks the relationship between digital games and gambling has become a topic of interest to mainstream society with both national media and politicians debating the topic\u00a04,\u00a030. This is the latest aspect that has seen increased attention placed on the…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":5,"featured_media":89,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,10,18],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/webpages.tuni.fi\/gamification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/79"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/webpages.tuni.fi\/gamification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/webpages.tuni.fi\/gamification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/webpages.tuni.fi\/gamification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/5"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/webpages.tuni.fi\/gamification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=79"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/webpages.tuni.fi\/gamification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/79\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/webpages.tuni.fi\/gamification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/89"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/webpages.tuni.fi\/gamification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=79"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/webpages.tuni.fi\/gamification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=79"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/webpages.tuni.fi\/gamification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=79"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}